Argumentation Semantics for Prioritised Default Logic

نویسنده

  • Anthony P. Young
چکیده

We endow prioritised default logic (PDL) with argumentation semantics using the ASPIC framework for structured argumentation, and prove that the conclusions of the justified arguments are exactly the prioritised default extensions. Argumentation semantics for PDL will allow for the application of argument game proof theories to the process of inference in PDL, making the reasons for accepting a conclusion transparent and the inference process more intuitive. This also opens up the possibility for argumentation-based distributed reasoning and communication amongst agents with PDL representations of mental attitudes.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Prioritised Default Logic as Rational Argumentation

We endow Brewka’s prioritised default logic (PDL) with argumentation semantics using the ASPIC framework for structured argumentation. We prove that the conclusions of the justified arguments correspond to the prioritised default extensions in a normatively rational manner. Argumentation semantics for PDL will allow for the application of argument game proof theories to the process of inference...

متن کامل

Prioritised Default Logic as Argumentation with Partial Order Default Priorities

We express Brewka’s prioritised default logic (PDL) as argumentation using ASPIC. By representing PDL as argumentation and designing an argument preference relation that takes the argument structure into account, we prove that the conclusions of the justified arguments correspond to the PDL extensions. We will first assume that the default priority is total, and then generalise to the case wher...

متن کامل

Logic program semantcs via an argumentation semantics

There are various semantics designed for argumentation frameworks. They enable to assign a meaning e.g. to odd-length cycles. Our main motivation is to transfer semantics proposed by Baroni, Giacomin and Guida for argumentation frameworks with odd-length cycles to logic programs with odd-length cycles through default negation. The developed construction is even stronger. For a given logic progr...

متن کامل

A Plausibility Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

We propose and investigate a simple plausibility-based extension semantics for abstract argumentation frameworks based on generic instantiations by default knowledge bases and the ranking construction paradigm for default reasoning.

متن کامل

On the theory of argumentation frameworks

argumentation has been developed in a theoretical way, in noteworthy works such as [Tou58], [Fel84], [Dun95], [KT96], [BDKT97], [KMD94], [Pol94], [Vre97], [PS96a], [PS97], and [Ver96]. Argumentation-theoretic interpretations and proof-procedures are applicable in practical reasoning, legal reasoning ([KT96], [PS95]), mediation systems ([GK96], [BG94]), decision-making systems ([KPG96]), and are...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1506.08813  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015